Rating
★★★★☆
Category
non-fiction
Read
2013-06-09
Pages
376

Early on reading “Sex at Dawn” I started hearing alarm bells. Something didn’t feel right, but I wasn’t familiar enough with the material to articulate it particularly well.

Enter this book, written in response and directly addressing the scientific claims made in “Sex at Dawn”. Its primary criticisms, supported by large bodies of evidence, are:

It was a much more complex treatment of the material (real life is messy), but didn’t pull any punches when they had to be thrown.

Cover image for Sex at Dusk